Trading Companies

von by Mark Häberlein Original aufOriginal in German, angezeigt aufdisplayed in EnglischEnglish
PublishedErschienen: 2018-09-10
    PrintDrucken E-mailE-mail XML MetadataXML Metadaten   

    Starting in the late medieval period, European long-distance trading activities increased in volume and density over a long period. Consequently, the capital demands of these activities also grew. The expansion of the European powers into other parts of the world, the demand of the emerging states for credit, and the emergence of new forms of production (putting-out, proto-industry, manufactories, factories) were central factors in this process. Trading companies, which in this article refers to partnerships formed between at least two people to engage in long-distance trading activities and larger financial transactions, reflected the growing demand for capital and manpower, and were to an extent the foundation upon which trading networks formed. This article describes the emerging organizational structures of trading companies from the 15th to the 19th century, traces processes of professionalization and specialization, and explores the role of merchants in cultural transfer processes.

    InhaltsverzeichnisTable of Contents
    See also the article "Le négociant européen" in the EHNE.

    Introduction

    Research on commercial history, which since the late-19th century has produced many studies on individual trading companies and groups of merchants, usually emphasizes the integral role of family and kinship in the organization of pre-industrial trade.1 Trading companies were generally partnerships between a small group of individuals, who were frequently members of the same family or closely related. Collaboration with relatives, who enjoyed a particularly high level of trust, is viewed as a central strategy for the minimization of risk and the reduction of transaction costs in pre-industrial long-distance trade. The marriage patterns of merchants can also be understood as an "Investitionsstrategie zur Produktion und Reproduktion sozialen Kapitals".2 The inter-generational duty of family members to maintain and improve the social status and economic circumstances of the family was an important motive for the formation of networks based on kinship. Social and familial norms perpetuated the duty to help in the family business and to work for its continuing success.3 However, familial and kinship ties were no safeguard against individual wrongdoing and poor commercial decisions. Where companies cultivated broader social relationships, these often helped the company to access additional and more precise information and to gain talented employees.4

    In the pre-industrial era, in addition to family companies there were many independent single traders, who transacted a large portion of regional and pedlar trade.5 However, even door-to-door trading was by no means the preserve of individuals living on their wits. In the and in , family companies emerged that were characterized by a division of labour, long-distance trading and credit relationships, and a high degree of geographical mobility.6 Apart from these, there were corporately organized "regulated companies" such as the "Merchant Adventurers" and the "Levant Company" that monopolized trade along specific routes and in which the participating merchants were subject to collective rules. "Joint-stock companies" had a state-chartered monopoly and also worked with a jointly-owned capital stock,7 though these only played a dominant role in a few branches of commerce. While the state-chartered Dutch and British East India companiesVereinigte Ostindische Companie IMGcontrolled trade with Asia in the 17th and 18th centuries,8 trade within Europe and across the Atlantic during this period remained the domain of family companies.

    In addition to family ties, ties of common origin and religion formed an important basis for joint trading ventures. While there is evidence of a small number of trading companies with partners from different countries from as early as 1500 (e.g., the Koler Kress Saronno company, a partnership of Nuremberg and Milanese merchants),9 these remained exceptional for a long period. Sephardic Jews in only started to enter sporadic partnerships with Christians from the late-18th century onward,10 and merchants who settled in the western trading metropoles of and preferred to work with compatriots. Kinship ties played a central role both in their migration and in the organization of their business affairs.11 The examples of the Hamburg overseas merchants, who were organized in family companies, and the Rothschild banking house, in which all leadership positions were occupied by family members,12 demonstrate the importance that kinship and religious ties still had in long-distance trade and international finance in the 19th century.

    Organizational forms

    While the majority of the trading and banking houses of the 15th to the 19th centuries were family companies, the specific organizational form which the partners chose was dependent on the legal circumstances in the respective jurisdiction and on cultural preferences. Italian and Spanish merchant families in the 15th and 16th centuries, such as the Medici, Salviati, Frescobaldi, Bonvisi and Ruiz families, founded a series of trading companies in important centres of European trade – , , , , , , , , and London – based on family ties. While these companies were formally relatively independent of one another, in reality there was a high degree of overlap in personnel and they cooperated closely with each other. The articles of association, which specified the capital investments as well as the rights and duties of the partners, were for a limited time period, but were regularly renewed. The individual branches of the trading company could be headed by partners (compagni) or by salaried employees (fattori). The size and organizational structure of the network of branch offices were adapted in a flexible manner to suit the commercial development and the interests of the trading company. Subsidiary companies and consortia were sometimes also formed with non-relatives for specific branches of commercial activity, but a preference was usually shown for other companies from the same region of origin.13

    Following the Italian example, southern German merchants in the 16th century came together to form private unlimited companies (Personalgesellschaften), in which partners invested specific capital sums "zu Gewinn und Verlust" (for profit and loss). However, in the event of a bankruptcy it was not just the partners' capital investments that were at stake. Their liability extended to the entirety of their assets, which explains why these companies became known in legal history as general partnerships. The basis of the company's organization and its commercial activity were specified in the articles of association, which – as in Italy – were for a fixed duration (usually between three and seven years), but which were regularly renewed. The articles specified the size of the individual stakes, the rights and duties of the partners, the date of the balancing of accounts, the paying out of profits, as well as the procedure in the event of the withdrawal of a partner from the company. The rights of the partners included, for example, viewing the cash books and representing the company to outside parties; duties included such tasks as business travel and the keeping of accounts. Larger companies began to distinguish between principal partners with voting rights, and non-voting shareholders, and they entrusted the management of the company to one or two of the principal partners. In large southern German trading companies such as those of the Fuggers and Welsers of Augsburg, the management of the company increasingly became concentrated in the hands of one or two "rulers" during the course of the 16th century.14

    In addition to the capital investments of the partners "for profit and loss", trading houses could also avail themselves of capital at a fixed interest rate as deposits. In doing so, they increased their capacity to engage in larger commercial transactions, but they also took on the risk of being unable to pay the depositors in the event of commercial difficulties and of going bankrupt. In the 16th century, Augsburg trading companies sought to limit this risk by accepting deposit capital primarily from relatives. However, an unfavourable ratio of equity to loan capital often led to bankruptcy under these conditions as well.15

    Large southern German trading companies established a permanent presence at important foreign trading centres, which was accommodated in purchased or leased premises that contained the employees' living quarters, the business rooms and the warehouses. The head employee or "factor" was bound by instructions, was accountable to the company management, and received a fixed salary. In some cases, he was a non-voting partner of the company, but not always. If for reasons of cost a company could not, or did not wish to maintain a permanent presence at a particular location, it had its business at that location transacted by an agent or commission merchant. In contrast with a factor, the latter also worked for other companies, as well as for himself, and he received a commission for his services.16 From the late-16th century onward, Italian, southern German and Dutch companies increasingly employed the services of commission merchants, agents and shippers to reduce transaction costs.17

    Extant articles of association of Italian trading companies that had a presence in demonstrate a similar pattern in the first half of the 18th century to that described for the Italian and southern German trading companies in the 16th century. These Italian companies were also overwhelmingly partnerships of two to eight family members, close relatives or people from the same region of origin. Articles of association with a fixed term of two to seven years with the option of renewal represented a "vorteilhafte Mischung aus Flexibilität, Kontinuität und Transparenz" (advantageous mixture of flexibility, continuity and transparency).18 The arbitration clauses contained in numerous articles of association of Italian and southern German companies have been interpreted as evidence of the preference for internal forms of conflict resolution. However, more recent studies demonstrate that merchants were by no means reluctant to have recourse to public courts in the event of internal disagreements regarding the fulfilment of contractual obligations. For example, disagreements regarding bills of exchange, articles of association and bankruptcies constituted a substantial portion of the cases heard by the highest courts of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.19

    While trading companies with unlimited liability on the part of the partners remained the predominant type throughout the early modern period,20 forms of liability limitation also emerged. Italy led the way in this area as well. The accommandite (limited commercial partnerships), which appear in the records from the 16th century onward, distinguished between the unlimited liability of the management and the limited liability of the rest of the partners. Similarly, partners in the Nuremberg Saigerhandel companies, which organized the production and distribution of copper and silver from mines in Saxony and Thuringia, were not exposed to any liability beyond their investment. From the 17th century onward, the limited commercial partnership became increasingly common and widespread in Europe.21

    Another system of company organization can be observed among Sephardic Jewish merchants in Venice and in the 18th century. Here, written articles of association appear to have been the exception. Instead, family arrangements and alliances – the preference for marriages among blood relatives, the joint administration of the paternal estate by the sons, large dowries that were invested as trading capital – formed the basis for trading companies that had neither fixed terms nor any form of liability limitation. However, successful companies in Livorno combined this traditional type of business organization with flexible forms of representation.22 The partnerships of London merchants engaged in overseas trade in the 18th century were likewise often based on verbal agreements; kinship appears to have been less important in this case than shared commercial interests and the idea of spreading risk to multiple shoulders.23

    Nationes of foreign merchants

    The merchant class in European trading metropoles was often highly international in composition. Of the up to 2000 merchants engaged in long-distance trade resident in Antwerp in the mid-16th century, only a quarter were born in the ; at that time the city was home to about 300 Spanish, 200 Italian, 150 Portuguese, 100 French and 300 German merchants, and they were augmented by 300 to 400 English merchants during the trade fairs. Consequently, the historian Fernand Braudel (1902–1985) described Antwerp as a "Welthauptstadt von fremden Gnaden" (capital of the world by foreign graces).24 In the 16th century, Italian merchant bankers played a very prominent role in Lyon; in 1571 they constituted 154 of the 183 foreign merchants and bankers registered in the French commercial metropolis.25 An internationalization of the merchant class can also be observed in German trading centres such as Nuremberg, Frankfurt am Main and from the second half of the 16th century onwards. As the native Nuremberg patricians increasingly withdrew from long-distance trade, representatives of Dutch, , and Italian trading companies settled in the Franconian city. In the years 1621–1624, 26 Italian and 32 Dutch companies were established there; at this time more than one fifth of the turnover at the Nuremburg Banco Publico was transacted by these two groups.26 The rise of Frankfurt to a commercial metropolis in the late-16th century was due in large part to the arrival of Dutch religious refugees and in the subsequent two decades many Italian merchants settled there as well.27 The increase in maritime trade through Hamburg around 1600 was assisted in no small part by the Dutch and Sephardic Jewish companies present there.28 Spanish and Portuguese Jews who were expelled from the Iberian Peninsula after 1492, often found favourable conditions of settlement and bright economic prospects in port cities. Maritime centres such as , Hamburg, Livorno, Venice, and London developed into cosmopolitan commercial cities not least because of the presence of substantial Jewish mercantile groups.29

    The foreign merchants were often organized in Nationes, which enjoyed a certain degree of internal autonomy and were characterized by close commercial and social relationships between their members. In some cases, they had their own places of worship and confraternities.30 The position of these Nationes within the respective city was generally characterized by a tension between liberties and privileges on the one hand, and restrictions and control on the other. For example, in Venice groups of foreign merchants were for a long time obliged to reside at specific locations such as the Fondaco dei Tedeschi (house of the German merchants)Fondaco dei tedeschi di sera, Farbphotographie, 2013, Photograph: Moroder; Bildquelle: Wikimedia Commons, , and to conduct their business under state supervision and in the presence of city brokers. As Venice was the most important centre for the procurement of goods from the eastern Mediterranean region, and as the republic prohibited its own subjects from engaging in trade with the Holy Roman Empire, the city was commercially very attractive for German merchants in spite of these restrictions, which were only loosened in the second half of the 16th century.31 Cities such as Hamburg and Frankfurt denied religious minorities full citizenship up to the beginning of the 19th century. In Lutheran Frankfurt, for example, it was not just Jews who were confined to an inferior legal status, but also Catholics and Reformed Protestants, and Italian merchant families fought for decades to gain legal and commercial equality with the native merchants.32 In the 17th century, the city council of Hamburg concluded collective foreign contracts with the Dutch and the Portuguese, which regulated their trading activities and formed the basis of their legal status as a Nationes.33 The presence of foreigners and minorities in European commercial cities was generally less attributable to abstract principles of tolerance than to concrete economic interests and pragmatic arrangements.

    Specialization and professionalization

    At the beginning of the early modern period, combining different forms of commercial and banking business was typical of the large Italian and southern German trading companies. For example, the commercial activities of the Fuggers of Augsburg encompassed silver, copper and gold mining, trading in metals, the putting-out of textiles, the procurement of luxury goods for royal clients, as well as loans to European monarchs.34 Due to this variety of activities, the Fugger Company and other large southern German trading companies developed "zu multifunktionalen, horizontal und vertikal gegliederten Unternehmen" (into multifunctional, horizontally and vertically structured enterprises).35 The companies that were founded in various southern and western European cities by members of the Bonvisi family from Lucca combined an extensive trade in goods with activities in the areas of exchanges, credit and insurance.36

    In addition to these merchant bankers who operated on an international scale, other forms of specialization were already evident in the 16th century. The Florentine Benvenuto Olivieri (1496–1549), who settled in and became one of the most important bankers of Pope Paul III (1468–1549) and for a time even served as depositor general of the Apostolic Chamber, was typical of a group of Tuscan merchants who concentrated on providing financial services to the Roman Curia, in particular supplying credit in return for the farming out of taxes and customs duties.37 In , small and medium-sized trading companies frequently concentrated on specific commercial branches. For example, in the 1550s textiles accounted for more than 90 percent of the turnover of the Grimmel company, which was directed from and .38

    A series of commercial and financial innovations that emerged at important trading centres such as Amsterdam, Hamburg, Frankfurt am Main and London from the late-16th to the 18th century brought about an increasing separation between mercantile and banking business, as well as an increasing specialization on individual branches of commerce, and on forms of commission trading and shipping business. The foundation of banks of exchange by city governments (Amsterdam in 1609, Hamburg in 1619), and the emergence of bill discount and endorsements made cashless payment and multi-lateral settlement between merchants easier. Stock exchangesJan Diricks van Campen, Hamburg Börse, 1606 developed into central sites for the coordination of business and the exchange of information. Printed price and exchange currents improved the flow of information about market trends and goods prices, and thus increased the transparency of market relationships. Maritime mapsSjökort över medelhavet, ca. 1681 , nautical handbooks, geographical works, textbooks on bookkeeping, and merchants' handbooks and almanacs provided traders, shipowners and ship captains with commercially relevant information.39 The increasing concentration and reliability of postal routesEuropäische Postkurse 1563 IMGand communications also assisted the exchange of mercantile correspondence.40

    Private banks that emerged at important financial centres such as Frankfurt, Cologne and Hamburg in a "langen Emanzipationsprozeß von den alten Kaufmanns- und Speditionsaktivitäten".41 concentrated initially on exchange business and lending to princely sovereigns, and their customers primarily came from the higher social strata. In the 18th century, banking houses such as that of the Bethmann brothers in Frankfurt also played an important role in supra-regional clearing and settlement, and as financiers to merchants and larger manufacturers.42 The English "country banks" that appeared in large numbers in the second half of the 18th century and the private banks of the 19th century combined exchanges, deposits and lending, and were an important source of capital for the establishment of businesses in the early phase of industrialization.43

    Trading companies can be divided based on the level of their involvement in the production of goods into "Nur-Kaufleute" (purely merchants), who concentrated exclusively on the marketing of goods, putting-out merchants, who coordinated the cottage export production of craft goods, manufacturers, who ran large centralized factories, and mining and metal entrepreneurs. While manufactories were heavily dependent on the demand of the courts and territorial states for luxury goods and materials for equipping standing armies, in the textile and metal trades putting-out tended to predominate. Putting-out involved merchants organizing the decentralized production of goods in homes and small workshops, as well as marketing the goods in and beyond the region of origin.44

    Merchants in proto-industrial regions often specialized in the distribution of regional craft goods and the organization of production processes. For example, the Johann Caspar Harkort Company based in Hagen-Westerbauer, which made the transition from a trading company to a factory in the 19th century, had concentrated from the 1670s on the distribution of iron and steel products from Brandenburg, particularly in the North Sea and regions, had put out raw materials to wire and steel producers and had acquired a number of hammer mills. While the distribution of goods through commission merchants – primarily in – was initially central to the company's business, in the second half of the 18th century direct trade by means of correspondence and commercial travel became increasingly important. Thus, the Harkort Company, which was family-owned and had close family ties with other merchants in the Rhine valley and Westphalia, specialized on a limited spectrum of high-quality products. Other commercial branches such as textiles, the processing of agricultural produce and the production of coal were only of secondary importance for this trading company.45

    In British trade with North America, changes in the law regarding trade and customs along with commercial and financial innovations also set processes of specialization and concentration in motion. For example, hundreds of small companies had been engaged in trade with the tobacco producing colonies of and in the 17th century. However, the raising of import duties, falling tobacco prices, the increasing complexity of credit relationships and the option of having shiploads of good insured meant that from the 1680s onwards a large portion of the tobacco trade was dominated by a handful of English companies – and after the Act of Union of 1707 some companiesMichael Faraday lecturing at the Royal Institution December 1855 IMG – who largely concentrated on Atlantic trade.46

    For central European companies, the distribution of colonial products, which they procured in the Atlantic port cities, became a lucrative field of business. For example, of the spectrum of goods traded by the Amman trading company in Schaffhausen in Switzerland around 1750, dyes – particularly indigo – accounted for two thirds, and stimulants such as sugar, tobacco and coffeeÖffentliches Kaffeehaus 1750/1800 IMGaccounted for one fifth. In the 1770s, dyes, which were supplied to textile producing regions such as , , northeastern Switzerland and the Danube region, actually constituted three quarters of the company's traded goods. The Swiss trading company procured these goods primarily in the French and Dutch Atlantic ports.47 The German merchants who settled in London and Cádiz in the 18th century often came from proto-industrial regions of northwestern Germany, and and combined the distribution of craft products from their regions of origin with the import of overseas goods.48

    The increasing specialization of trading and banking houses in particular fields of business was accompanied by tendencies towards professionalization. As early as the late-medieval period, it had been common for merchants' sons to be sent to important European trading centres at a young age to be educated. There they could learn foreign languages, the techniques of commercial accounting and commercial practices.49 This education, which was generally quite hands-on, was increasingly systematized and differentiated through the use of commercial handbooks and notebooks, as well as textbooks and treatises.50 Among the factors and other employees of large southern German trading companies in the 16th century, who underwent a careful education, were remunerated for their activities, and could climb up the ranks within the internal company hierarchy (merchant's assistant, accounts clerk, cashier, factor, chief accountant), already evinced characteristics of a professional class of commercial employees.51 Textbooks from the 18th century such as Carl Günther Ludovici's Grundriß eines vollständigen Kaufmanns-Systems (Leipzig 1756) stated that an "ehrbarer Kaufmann" (honest merchant) was distinguished by the fact "dass er die Handlung gehörig gelernt habe, oder doch wenigstens verstehe; insonderheit aber muß er diejenige Handlungsart, die er zu treiben gedenkt, wohl begriffen haben".52

    Trade and cultural transfer

    Over the course of the early modern period, the systemization of commercial knowledge in merchants' handbooks, textbooks and treatises led to a gradual standardization of commercial practices and the emergence of an international mercantile culture. For example, it has been observed that commercial correspondence in the 18th century largely adhered to uniform rhetorical conventions and was guided by cross-cultural norms of politeness, friendly engagement and reciprocity. The multilingualism that was common among merchants and the availability of multilingual letter guides and form books made communication across cultural boundaries easier. In addition to the concentrated networks of commercial correspondence, which enabled the exchange of information on the reputation, trustworthiness and dependability of business partners, these common standards for commercial behaviour were an essential prerequisite for the functioning of long-distance trading relationships across cultural boundaries, such as those that existed in the intercontinental trade in coral and jewels between the Sephardic Jewish trading house of Ergas and Silvera in Livorno, their Italian business partner in and Hindu merchants in in India.53

    Trading companies also served as agents in processes of cultural transfer through their distribution of works of art, books and luxury goods. The Fuggers of Augsburg, for example, played a pioneering role in transalpine cultural transfer in the 16th century through their recruiting of Italian artists and craftsmen, and the procurement of paintings, sculptures, antiquities and other valuable objects for their own households and art cabinets as well as for southern German rulers with whom they were connected.54 The career of the merchant Anton Meuting (1524–1591) illustrates how porous the boundary between trade and diplomacy still was at the beginning of the modern era.55 Between the 1550s and his death in 1591, he repeatedly travelled to as an agent and emissary of the Bavarian dukes, bringing back valuable presents from the Spanish royal family to Munich as well as selling luxury goods there in a private capacity. In the 17th century, merchants such as the Augsburger Philipp Hainhofer (1578–1647) began to concentrate on the procurement of works of art and luxury goods for European rulers, as well as the coordination and financing of large art projectsPhilip Hainhofer (1578–1647), Augsburger Kunstschrank für Gustav II. Adolf (1594–1632), 1625–1632 IMG.56 The growing demand among court, aristocratic and wealthy bourgeois circles led to the emergence of art and luxury goods markets in metropoles like Amsterdam, , Hamburg, Frankfurt and , which were run by specialized art dealerships and auction houses.57

    Regular contact with European royal courts, the investment of trading profits in landed property in the countryside and the accumulation of one's own territorial complex, being awarded titles of nobility in return for commercial and financial services, marriage ties with aristocratic families, and the adoption of the lifestyle of the courtly and aristocratic elites ultimately enabled wealthy merchant families to rise into the nobility. In the 16th century, the Florentine Medicis rose to the position of grand dukes of . By 1600, the Fuggers of Augsburg were hereditary imperial counts, and held title to lands and sovereign rights in around 100 Swabian villages. A process of ennoblement can also be observed in the case of prominent Amsterdam and Venetian merchant families in the 17th century, as well as among the large London merchants in the 18th and 19th centuries.58 Notwithstanding the attractiveness of aristocratic trappings, it cannot be assumed that these processes of social advancement lowered the social position of the merchant class. On the contrary, the gaps left behind in its ranks by the process of ennoblement were usually quickly filled by mercantile social climbers and immigrants. Thus, the merchant class was by no means static. It was subject to constant social and cultural change.

    Mark Häberlein

    Appendix

    Literature

    Amend-Traut, Anja: Brentano, Fugger und Konsorten – Handelsgesellschaften vor dem Reichskammergericht, Wetzlar 2009 (Schriftenreihe der Gesellschaft für Reichskammergerichtsforschung 37).

    Bayard, Françoise: Les Bonvisi, marchands banquiers à Lyon: 1575–1629, in: Annales E.S.C. 26 (1971), pp. 1234–1269.

    Bratchel, M.E.: Italian Merchant Organization and Business Relationships in Early Tudor London, in: Journal of European Economic History 7, 1 (1978), pp. 5–32.

    Braudel, Fernand: Sozialgeschichte des 15.–18. Jahrhunderts, Munich 1986, vol. 2: Der Handel.

    Braudel, Fernand: Sozialgeschichte des 15.–18. Jahrhunderts, Munich 1986, vol. 3: Aufbruch zur Weltwirtschaft.

    Braunstein, Philippe: Wirtschaftliche Beziehungen zwischen Nürnberg und Italien im Spätmittelalter, in: Stadtarchiv Nürnberg (ed.): Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsgeschichte Nürnbergs, Nuremberg 1967, vol. 1, pp. 377–406.

    Brenner, Robert: The Social Basis of English Commercial Expansion: 1550–1650, in: Journal of Economic History 22,2 (1972), pp. 361–384.

    Bruchhäuser, Hanns-Peter: Kaufmannsbildung im Mittelalter: Determinanten des Curriculums deutscher Kaufleute im Spiegel der Formalisierung von Qualifizierungsprozessen, Cologne et al. 1989.

    Brulez, Wilfrid: De firma della Faille en de internationale handel van Vlaamse firma's in de 16e eeuw, Brussels 1959.

    Bullard, Melissa M.: "Mercatores Fiorentini Romanam Curiam Sequentes" in the Early Sixteenth Century, in: Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 6 (1976), pp. 51–71.

    Burke, Peter: Venice and Amsterdam: A Study of Seventeenth-Century Elites, London 1974.

    Cesarani, David (ed.): Port Jews: Jewish communities in cosmopolitan maritime trading centres: 1550–1950, London 2002.

    Denzel, Markus A.: Professionalisierung und sozialer Aufstieg bei oberdeutschen Kaufleuten und Faktoren im 16. Jahrhundert, in: Günther Schulz (ed.): Sozialer Aufstieg: Funktionseliten im Spätmittelalter und in der frühen Neuzeit, Munich 2002, pp. 413–442 (Büdinger Gespräche 2000–2001).

    Denzel, Markus A.: Die Geschäftsbeziehungen des Schaffhauser Handels- und Bankhauses Amman 1748–1779: Ein mikroökonomisches Fallbeispiel, in: Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 89 (2002), pp. 1–40.

    Denzel, Markus A. et al. (eds.): Kaufmannsbücher und Handelspraktiken vom Mittelalter bis zum beginnenden 20. Jahrhundert / Merchant's Books and Mercantile Practices from the Late Middle Ages to the 20th Century, Stuttgart 2002.

    Denzel, Markus A. / Pfister, Ulrich: Handelsgesellschaft, in: Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit 5 (2007), columns 97–101.

    De Roover, Raymond: The Rise and Decline of the Medici Bank: 1397–1494, Cambridge, MA 1963.

    Diefenbacher, Michael: Handel im Wandel: Die Handels- und Wirtschaftsmetropole Nürnberg in der frühen Neuzeit (1550–1630), in: Bernhard Kirchgässner et al. (eds.): Stadt und Handel: 32. Arbeitstagung in Schwäbisch Hall 1993, Sigmaringen 1995, pp. 63–81.

    Ferguson, Niall: Die Geschichte der Rothschilds: Propheten des Geldes, Stuttgart et al. 2002.

    Fontaine, Laurence: History of Pedlars in Europe, Cambridge 1996.

    Gascon, Richard: Grand commerce et vie urbaine au XVIe siècle: Lyon et ses marchands (environs de 1520–environs de 1580), Paris 1971.

    Glück, Helmut et al. (eds.): Mehrsprachigkeit in der Frühen Neuzeit: Die Reichsstädte Augsburg und Nürnberg vom 15. bis ins frühe 19. Jahrhundert, Wiesbaden 2013.

    Gorißen, Stefan: Vom Handelshaus zum Unternehmen: Sozialgeschichte der Firma Harkort im Zeitalter der Protoindustrie (1720–1820), Göttingen 2002.

    Grassby, Richard: The Business Community of Seventeenth-Century England, Cambridge 1995.

    Guidi Bruscoli, Francesco: Papal Banking in Renaissance Rome: Benvenuto Olivieri and Paul III: 1534–1549, Aldershot 2007.

    Häberlein, Mark: Brüder, Freunde und Betrüger: Soziale Beziehungen, Normen und Konflikte in der Augsburger Kaufmannschaft um die Mitte des 16. Jahrhunderts, Berlin 1998.

    Häberlein, Mark: Handelsgesellschaften, Sozialbeziehungen und Kommunikationsnetze in Oberdeutschland zwischen dem ausgehenden 15. und der Mitte des 16. Jahrhunderts, in: Carl A. Hoffmann et al. (eds.): Kommunikation und Region, Konstanz 2001, pp. 305–326.

    Häberlein, Mark: Die Fugger: Geschichte einer Augsburger Familie (1367–1650), Stuttgart 2006.

    Häberlein, Mark: Der Fondaco dei Tedeschi in Venedig und der Italienhandel oberdeutscher Kaufleute (ca. 1450–1650), in: Hans-Michael Körner et al. (eds.): Bayern und Italien: Kontinuität und Wandel ihrer traditionellen Beziehungen, Lindenberg im Allgäu 2010, pp. 124–139.

    Häberlein, Mark / Bayreuther, Magdalena: Agent und Ambassador: Der Kaufmann Anton Meuting als Vermittler zwischen Bayern und Spanien im Zeitalter Philipps II., Augsburg 2013.

    Haggerty, Sheryllynne: "I could do for the Dickmans": When Family Networks Don't Work, in: Andreas Gestrich et al. (eds.): Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society: 1660–1914, London 2011, pp. 317–342 (German Historical Institute London Bulletin 2).

    Hancock, David: Citizens of the World: London Merchants and the Integration of the British Atlantic Community: 1735–1785, Cambridge 1995.

    Hildebrandt, Reinhard: Diener und Herren: Zur Anatomie großer Unternehmen im Zeitalter der Fugger, in: Johannes Burkhardt (ed.): Augsburger Handelshäuser im Wandel des historischen Urteils, Berlin 1996, pp. 149–174.

    Hildebrandt, Reinhard: Unternehmensstrukturen im Wandel: Personal- und Kapitalgesellschaften vom 15.–17. Jahrhundert, in: Hans-Jürgen Gerhard (ed.): Struktur und Dimension: Festschrift für Karl Heinrich Kaufhold zum 65. Geburtstag, Stuttgart 1997, pp. 93–110, vol. 1: Mittelalter und Frühe Neuzeit.

    Hoock, Jochen et al. (eds.): Ars Mercatoria: Handbücher und Traktate für den Gebrauch des Kaufmanns: 1470–1820: Eine analytische Bibliographie, Paderborn 2001, vol. 3: Analysen.

    Houtman-De Smedt, Helma / Van der Wee, Herman: Die Entstehung des modernen Geld- und Finanzwesens Europas in der Neuzeit, in: Hans Pohl (ed.): Europäische Bankengeschichte, Frankfurt am Main 1993, pp. 73–173.

    Jaspert, Nikolaus: Dem Reich verbunden: Gemeinschaftsbildung und Frömmigkeit deutscher Kaufleute und Handwerker in Lyon (um 1500), in: Marie-Luise Heckmann et al. (eds.): Von Nowgorod bis London: Studien zu Handel, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft im mittelalterlichen Europa: Festschrift für Stuart Jenks zum 60. Geburtstag, Göttingen 2008, pp. 489–511.

    Kellenbenz, Hermann: Handelsgesellschaft, in: Handwörterbuch zur deutschen Rechtsgeschichte 1 (1971), columns 1936–1942.

    Kriedte, Peter: Trade, in: Sheilagh Ogilvie (ed.): Germany: A New Social and Economic History, London et al. 1996, vol. 2: 1630–1800, pp. 100–133.

    Landsteiner, Erich: Kein Zeitalter der Fugger: Zentraleuropa 1450–1620, in: Friedrich Edelmayer et al. (eds.): Globalgeschichte 1450–1620: Anfänge und Perspektiven, Vienna 2002, pp. 95–123.

    Lang, Heinrich: Fremdsprachenkompetenz zwischen Handelsverbindungen und Familiennetzwerken: Augsburger Kaufmannssöhne aus dem Welser-Umfeld in der Ausbildung bei Florentiner Bankiers um 1500, in Mark Häberlein et al. (eds.): Fremde Sprachen in frühneuzeitlichen Städten: Lernende, Lehrende und Lehrwerke, Wiesbaden 2010, pp. 75–91.

    Lapeyre, Henri: Une famille de marchands: Les Ruiz, Paris et al. 1955.

    Lesger, Clé: The Rise of the Amsterdam Market and Information Exchange: Merchants, Commercial Expansion and Change in the Spatial Economy of the Low Countries: c. 1550–1630, Aldershot 2006.

    Lutz, Elmar: Die rechtliche Struktur süddeutscher Handelsgesellschaften in der Zeit der Fugger, Tübingen 1976, vol. 1–2.

    Mandrou, Robert: Die Fugger als Grundbesitzer in Schwaben 1560–1618: Eine Fallstudie sozioökonomischen Verhaltens am Ende des 16. Jahrhunderts, Göttingen 1997.

    Mathias, Peter: Risk, Credit and Kinship in Early Modern Enterprise, in: John J. McCusker et al. (eds.): The Early Modern Atlantic Economy, Cambridge 2000, pp. 15–35.

    Mauro, Frédéric: Merchant Communities: 1350–1750, in: James D. Tracy (ed.): The Rise of Merchant Empires: Long-Distance Trade in the Early Modern World: 1350–1750, Cambridge et al. 1990, pp. 255–286.

    McCusker, John J.: Essays in the Economic History of the Atlantic World, London et al. 1997.

    Morineau, Michel: Eastern and Western Merchants from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Centuries, in: Sushil Chaudhury et al. (eds.): Merchants, Companies and Trade: Europe and Asia in the Early Modern Era, Cambridge 1999, pp. 116–144.

    Nagel, Jürgen G.: Abenteuer Fernhandel: Die Ostindienkompanien, Darmstadt 2006.

    North, Michael et al. (eds.): Art Markets in Europe: 1400–1800, Aldershot 1998.

    North, Michael: Kommunikation, Handel, Geld und Banken in der Frühen Neuzeit, Munich 2000 (Enzyklopädie deutscher Geschichte 59).

    North, Michael: Genuss und Glück des Lebens: Kulturkonsum im Zeitalter der Aufklärung, Cologne et al. 2003.

    Nutz, Andreas: Unternehmensplanung und Geschäftspraxis im 16. Jahrhundert: Die Handelsgesellschaft Felix und Jakob Grimmel zwischen 1550 und 1560, St. Katharinen 1996.

    Oberpenning, Hannelore: Migration und Fernhandel im 'Tödden-System': Wanderhändler aus dem nördlichen Münsterland im mittleren und nördlichen Europa des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts, Osnabrück 1996.

    Peters, Lambert F.: Der Handel Nürnbergs am Anfang des Dreißigjährigen Krieges: Strukturkomponenten, Unternehmen und Unternehmer: Eine quantitative Analyse, Stuttgart 1994.

    Poettering, Jorun: Handel, Nation und Religion: Kaufleute zwischen Hamburg und Portugal im 17. Jahrhundert, Göttingen 2013.

    Price, Jacob M.: Perry of London: A Family and a Firm on the Seaborne Frontier: 1615–1753, Cambridge, MA et al. 1992.

    Price, Jacob M. / Clemens, Paul G.E.: A Revolution of Scale in Overseas Trade: British Firms in the Chesapeake Trade: 1675–1775, in: Journal of Economic History 47, 1 (1987), pp. 1–43.

    Reves, Christiane: Vom Pomeranzengängler zum Großhändler? Netzwerke und Migrationsverhalten der Brentano-Familien im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, Paderborn et al. 2012.

    Roeck, Bernd: Philipp Hainhofer: Unternehmer in Sachen Kunst, in: Louis Carlen et al. (eds.): Kräfte der Wirtschaft: Unternehmergestalten des Alpenraums im 17. Jahrhundert, Brig 1992, pp. 9–53.

    Schilling, Heinz: Niederländische Exulanten im 16. Jahrhundert: Ihre Stellung im Sozialgefüge und im religiösen Leben deutscher und englischer Städte, Gütersloh 1972.

    Schneider, Britta: Fugger contra Fugger: Die Augsburger Handelsgesellschaft zwischen Kontinuität und Konflikt (1560–1597/98), Dissertation, Augsburg 2016.

    Schulte Beerbühl, Margrit: Deutsche Kaufleute in London: Welthandel und Einbürgerung (1660–1818), Munich 2007.

    Schulte Beerbühl, Margrit / Weber, Klaus: From Westphalia to the Caribbean: Networks of German Textile Merchants in the Eighteenth Century, in: Andreas Gestrich et al. (eds.): Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society: 1660–1914, London 2011, pp. 53–98 (German Historical Institute London Bulletin 2).

    Trivellato, Francesca: The Familiarity of Strangers: The Sephardic Diaspora, Livorno, and Cross-Cultural Trade in the Early Modern Period, New Haven et al. 2009.

    Van der Wee, Hermann / Materné, Jan: Antwerp as a World Market in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, in: Jan van der Stock (ed.): Antwerp, Story of a Metropolis (16th–17th centuries), Ghent 1993, pp. 19–32.

    Veluwenkamp, Jan Willem: Kaufmännisches Verhalten und Familiennetzwerke im niederländischen Russlandhandel (1590–1750), in: Mark Häberlein et al. (eds.): Praktiken des Handels: Geschäfte und soziale Beziehungen europäischer Kaufleute in Mittelalter und früher Neuzeit, Constance 2010, pp. 379–405.

    Vogt, Annette-Christine: Ein Hamburger Beitrag zur Entwicklung des Welthandels im 19. Jahrhundert: Die Kaufmannsreederei Wappäus im internationalen Handel Venezuelas und der dänischen sowie niederländischen Antillen, Stuttgart 2003.

    Weber, Klaus: Deutsche Kaufleute im Atlantikhandel 1680–1830: Unternehmen und Familien in Hamburg, Cádiz und Bordeaux, Munich 2004.

    Wölfle, Sylvia: Die Kunstpatronage der Fugger 1560–1618, Augsburg 2009.

    Zellfelder, Friedrich: Das Kundennetz des Bankhauses Gebrüder Bethmann (1738–1816), Stuttgart 1994.

    Notes

    1. ^ See Denzel, Enzyklopädie 2007, columns 98f.
    2. ^ "investment strategy for the production and reproduction of social capital" Translated by N. Williams. "Investitionsstrategie zur Produktion und Reproduktion sozialen Kapitals" In: Gorißen, Handelshaus 2002, p. 158.
    3. ^ Grassby, Business Community 1995, pp. 90, 162, 308, 329–331, 401–403; Häberlein, Brüder 1998, pp. 274–287; Mathias, Risk 2000; Veluwenkamp, Kaufmännisches Verhalten 2010, pp. 381–386.
    4. ^ Grassby, Business Community 1995, pp. 329–331; Haggerty, Dickmans 2011.
    5. ^ Kriedte, Trade 1996, p. 110; Morineau, Merchants 1999, pp. 125–127.
    6. ^ Fontaine, History of Pedlars 1996; Oberpenning, Migration 1996.
    7. ^ Brenner, Social Basis 1972, p. 376; Grassby, Business Community 1995, pp. 404–407; Hildebrandt, Unternehmensstrukturen 1997, pp. 106–110; Denzel, Enzyklopädie 2007, columns 99–101.
    8. ^ For an overview, see Nagel, Abenteuer Fernhandel 2006.
    9. ^ Braunstein, Beziehungen 1967, pp. 382f., pp. 398f.
    10. ^ Trivellato, Familiarity 2009, pp. 132f.
    11. ^ Weber, Deutsche Kaufleute 2004, pp. 37–153, pp. 266–286; Schulte Beerbühl, Deutsche Kaufleute 2007, pp. 175–182, pp. 190–198.
    12. ^ Ferguson, Geschichte der Rothschilds 2002.
    13. ^ De Roover, Rise 1963, pp. 77–86; Lapeyre, Une famille 1955, pp. 143–152; Bayard, Les Bonvisi 1971; Bratchel, Merchant Organization 1978; Braudel, Sozialgeschichte 1986, vol. 2, pp. 476–480; Guidi Bruscoli, Papal Banking 2007, pp. 28–38.
    14. ^ Kellenbenz, Handelsgesellschaft 1971, column 1939; Lutz, Struktur 1976, vol. 1, pp. 202–478; Hildebrandt, Unternehmensstrukturen 1997, pp. 95–106.
    15. ^ Häberlein, Brüder 1998, pp. 168–254.
    16. ^ Hildebrandt, Diener und Herren 1996, pp. 45–50; Häberlein, Handelsgesellschaften 2001, pp. 308–313; Häberlein, Fugger 2006, pp. 120–122; Denzel, Enzyklopädie 2007, column 99.
    17. ^ Brulez, De firma 1959, pp. 367–375; Bratchel, Merchant Organization 1978, pp. 29–31; Braudel, Sozialgeschichte 1986, vol. 3, pp. 262–265; Landsteiner, Zeitalter 2002, p. 98.
    18. ^ Reves, Pomeranzengängler 2012, pp. 189–221.
    19. ^ Amend-Traut, Brentano 2009; Schneider, Fugger 2016.
    20. ^ See also Grassby, Business Community 1995, p. 86, p. 90.
    21. ^ Brulez, De firma 1959, pp. 366f.; Kellenbenz, Handelsgesellschaft 1971, columns 1937, 1939f.; Braudel, Sozialgeschichte 1986, vol. 2, pp. 480–482; Amend-Traut, Brentano 2009, p. 17.
    22. ^ Trivellato, Familiarity 2009, pp. 132–152.
    23. ^ Hancock, Citizens 1995, pp. 104–109.
    24. ^ Van der Wee / Materné, Antwerp 1993, p. 23; Braudel, Sozialgeschichte 1986, vol. 3, p. 152.
    25. ^ Gascon, Commerce 1971, pp. 358–364.
    26. ^ Peters, Handel Nürnbergs 1994, pp. 99–104 et passim; Diefenbacher, Handel im Wandel 1995, pp. 71–76; Kriedte, Trade 1996, pp. 116f.
    27. ^ Schilling, Exulanten 1972, pp. 52–59; Kriedte, Trade 1996, p. 117; Reves, Pomeranzengängler 2012, pp. 235–252.
    28. ^ Schilling, Exulanten 1972, pp. 77–79; Kriedte, Trade 1996, pp. 118f.; Poettering, Handel 2013, pp. 206–220.
    29. ^ Cesarani, Port Jews 2002; Trivellato, Familiarity 2009, pp. 70–115.
    30. ^ On Rome, see Guidi Bruscoli, Papal Banking 2007, pp. 8–23, pp. 46–63; on Antwerp and Lyon, see Mauro, Merchant Communities 1990, pp. 261–266; Jaspert, Reich 2008.
    31. ^ For a summary, see Häberlein, Der Fondaco dei Tedeschi 2010.
    32. ^ Reves, Pomeranzengängler 2012, pp. 252–286.
    33. ^ Poettering, Handel 2013, pp. 61–76.
    34. ^ Häberlein, Fugger 2006, pp. 36–119.
    35. ^ See Hildebrandt, Unternehmensstrukturen 1997, p. 96.
    36. ^ Bayard, Les Bonvisi 1971.
    37. ^ Bullard, Mercatores Fiorentini 1976; Guidi Bruscoli, Papal Banking 2007.
    38. ^ Nutz, Unternehmensplanung 1996, p. 160.
    39. ^ Braudel, Sozialgeschichte 1986, vol. 3, pp. 265–267; Houtman-De Smedt / Van der Wee, Entstehung 1993, pp. 132–135; McCusker, Economic History 1997, pp. 117–176; North, Kommunikation 2000, pp. 24f., pp. 33–37; Lesger, The Rise of the Amsterdam Market 2006, pp. 222–257.
    40. ^ Kriedte, Trade 1996, pp. 104f.
    41. ^ "long process of emancipation from the old mercantile and shipping activities" Translated by N. Williams. "langen Emanzipationsprozeß von den alten Kaufmanns- und Speditionsaktivitäten" In: North, Kommunikation 2000, p. 42.
    42. ^ Zellfelder, Kundennetz 1994; Kriedte, Trade 1996, p. 111.
    43. ^ Houtman-De Smedt / Van der Wee, Entstehung 1993, pp. 141–166, pp. 202–206.
    44. ^ Gorißen, Handelshaus 2002, pp. 369–375.
    45. ^ Gorißen, Handelshaus 2002, pp. 168–297, pp. 361–367.
    46. ^ Price / Clemens, Revolution 1987; Price, Perry 1992, pp. 32–51.
    47. ^ Denzel, Geschäftsbeziehungen 2002, pp. 13–22.
    48. ^ Weber, Deutsche Kaufleute 2004, pp. 37–116, pp. 275–286; Schulte Beerbühl, Deutsche Kaufleute 2007, pp. 327–348; Schulte Beerbühl / Weber, Westphalia 2011.
    49. ^ Bruchhäuser, Kaufmannsbildung 1989; Grassby, Business Community 1995, pp. 178–196; specifically on the acquisition of foreign languages: Lang, Fremdsprachenkompetenz 2010; Glück, Mehrsprachigkeit 2013.
    50. ^ Lapeyre, Une famille 1955, pp. 137–140; Denzel, Kaufmannsbücher 2002; Hoock, Ars Mercatoria 2001.
    51. ^ Hildebrandt, Diener und Herren 1996; Denzel, Professionalisierung 2002.
    52. ^ "that he has sufficiently learned the trade, or at least understands it; in particular, he must understand well the type of trade that he wishes to engage in" Translated by N. Williams. "dass er die Handlung gehörig gelernt habe, oder doch wenigstens verstehe; insonderheit aber muß er diejenige Handlungsart, die er zu treiben gedenkt, wohl begriffen haben" Cited from: Gorißen, Handelshaus 2002, p. 368.
    53. ^ Trivellato, Familiarity 2009, pp. 177–193, pp. 273–275; see also Poettering, Handel 2013, pp. 239–250.
    54. ^ Wölfle, Kunstpatronage 2009.
    55. ^ Häberlein / Bayreuther, Agent 2013.
    56. ^ Roeck, Philipp Hainhofer 1992.
    57. ^ North, Art Markets 1998; North, Genuss 2003, pp. 134–139.
    58. ^ For example, see: Burke, Venice 1974; Mandrou, Fugger 1997.

    Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
    Dieser Text ist lizensiert unter This text is licensed under: CC by-nc-nd 3.0 Germany - Attribution, Noncommercial, No Derivative Works

    Übersetzt von:Translated by: Niall Williams
    Fachherausgeber:Editor: Toni Pierenkemper
    Redaktion:Copy Editor: Claudia Falk


    Indices



    ZitierempfehlungCitation

    : Trading Companies, in: Europäische Geschichte Online (EGO), hg. vom Leibniz-Institut für Europäische Geschichte (IEG), Mainz European History Online (EGO), published by the Leibniz Institute of European History (IEG), Mainz 2018-09-10. URL: http://www.ieg-ego.eu/haeberleinm-2016-en URN: urn:nbn:de:0159-2018082830 [JJJJ-MM-TT][YYYY-MM-DD].

    Bitte setzen Sie beim Zitieren dieses Beitrages hinter der URL-Angabe in Klammern das Datum Ihres letzten Besuchs dieser Online-Adresse ein. Beim Zitieren einer bestimmten Passage aus dem Beitrag bitte zusätzlich die Nummer des Textabschnitts angeben, z.B. 2 oder 1-4.

    When quoting this article please add the date of your last retrieval in brackets after the url. When quoting a certain passage from the article please also insert the corresponding number(s), for example 2 or 1-4.


    Titelexport ausExport citation from: HeBIS-Online-KatalogHeBIS Online Catalogue external link